Experts Downplay Russia’s “Nuclear-Powered Missile” Claims, Calling It Nothing Revolutionary
Military experts have downplayed President Vladimir Putin’s claims about Russia’s new nuclear-powered weapons, saying the Burevestnik missile and Poseidon torpedo are technically risky and far from revolutionary. Analysts believe the announcement is more about political messaging than real battlefield impact.
Experts Downplay Russia’s “Nuclear-Powered Missile” Claims, Calling It Nothing Revolutionary
Military analysts have cast doubt on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s claims about the country’s new nuclear-powered cruise missile “Burevestnik” and nuclear torpedo “Poseidon.” Despite Putin’s description of them as “game-changing weapons,” experts say the technology is not as advanced or unique as presented.
The Burevestnik missile is said to have an unlimited range and the ability to evade Western air defense systems. However, analysts note that such systems face major technical and safety challenges, particularly related to controlling and containing a nuclear-powered engine.
Similarly, the Poseidon torpedo, designed to carry nuclear warheads across oceans, is seen as more symbolic than practical by many defense experts. They argue that while it could cause catastrophic damage, its slow speed and complexity make it unsuitable for modern warfare.
Experts also point out that Russia’s focus on such weapons may be part of a psychological and political strategy, aimed at reinforcing its image as a nuclear superpower amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.
“These are more about propaganda and deterrence than actual battlefield use,” said one Western defense analyst.