Why Is There Intense Debate Over the Proposal to Change the Constitution of Bangladesh, Replacing Secularism with Pluralism?

Why Is There Intense Debate Over the Proposal to Change the Constitution of Bangladesh, Replacing Secularism with Pluralism?

Dhaka, January 17: There is growing discussion over the proposal to change the fundamental principles of the Constitution of Bangladesh, put forward by the commission formed for constitutional reform. Intense criticism and support are being expressed on social media, leading to heightened debate on the issue.

The current constitution mentions nationalism, socialism, democracy, and secularism as the state principles. However, in their report, the commission has proposed new principles, including 'equality, human dignity, social justice, pluralism, and democracy.'

The commission's head, Professor Ali Riaz, stated, "We recommend five state principles as a reflection of the great ideals of the 1971 liberation war and the popular aspirations of the 2024 people's uprising."

Additionally, there is a proposal to replace 'secularism' with 'pluralism.' Professor Ali Riaz explained, "Bangladesh is a pluralistic, multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-lingual, and multi-cultural country where coexistence and dignity of all communities will be ensured."

However, the proposal to abolish secularism has sparked severe criticism. Kajol Devnath, President of the Bangladesh Hindu-Buddhist-Christian Unity Council, stated, "Although secularism is in the constitution, it has no real effectiveness, but it works as a safeguard." He also said, "I see pluralism as an eyewash (deception)."

Professor Kaberi Gayan of Dhaka University also criticized the proposal to abolish secularism, stating, "I reject this new constitution that removes secularism."

Meanwhile, the commission has proposed changes like the expansion of the parliament's size and the creation of a "National Constitutional Council" to curb the Prime Minister's excessive powers. These changes, according to the commission, could bring significant alterations to the governance structure.

Despite the ongoing debate over the proposal, Professor Riaz, the commission's head, has commented that their recommendations aim to institutionally close the path to autocracy. "A constitution where a no-confidence motion against the Prime Minister cannot be introduced creates the conditions for autocracy. We have proposed a constitutional council to block that path," Professor Riaz explained.